
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Stalin's Englishman: The Lives of Guy Burgess Hardcover – January 1, 1800
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHodder & Stoughton Educational
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1800
- Dimensions6.61 x 1.54 x 9.33 inches
- ISBN-101473627362
- ISBN-13978-1473627369
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Product details
- Publisher : Hodder & Stoughton Educational; First Edition (January 1, 1800)
- Language : English
- ISBN-10 : 1473627362
- ISBN-13 : 978-1473627369
- Item Weight : 1.69 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.61 x 1.54 x 9.33 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,299,216 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #19,436 in Historical Biographies (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Andrew Lownie was educated at Magdalene College, Cambridge, where he was Dunster History Prizeman and President of the Union, before taking his Masters and doctorate at Edinburgh University. A Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, he later returned to Cambridge as a visiting fellow at Churchill College.
He has been a bookseller, publisher, journalist , writing for the Times, Telegraph, Wall Street Journal , Spectator and Guardian, and since 1988 has run his own literary agency specialising in history and biography.
He is President of the Biographers Club, sits on the board of Biographers International Organisation and is a Trustee of the Campaign for Freedom of Information.
Born in Kenya and brought up in Bermuda, he now lives in London near Westminster Abbey. He has a particular interest in spies, Scotland and revisionist biography.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I first heard the name "Guy Burgess" when I read a biography of Kim Philby twenty years ago. That book ignited a lifelong interest in the history of cold war espionage. I've since read countless books on the subject, including a dozen about Philby himself, and another dozen about the other Cambridge Spies in his orbit, including Burgess, Maclean, Blunt, Cairncross, Rees, and Straight.
About 15 years ago I first read somewhere that an exhaustive biography of Guy Burgess by Andrew Lownie would soon be published. I was very intrigued because Burgess was the most 'colorful' of those Cambridge Spies, but, other than a very short biography from the 1950s by 'fellow traveler' Tom Driberg, one about whom relatively little had seemingly been publicly disclosed. Buty that book was never published for whatever reason, until recently. Here it is, at long last.
This 330 page book fills that gap in 'the literature' phenomenally well. A lot of the detail was new to me. But as the extensive end notes make clear, what Lownie has also done exquisitely well is cull and collect the details about Burgess previously published over six decades in the myriad non-fiction books about the Cambridge Spies, and knit that all together, along with a lot of new information, into a compelling and revealing mosaic.
The result answers the two questions about Guy Burgess that had lingered unanswered in my mind for decades: (i) how did a man caricatured in 'the literature' as a dirty, louche, openly gay (at a time that was illegal in Britain) and communist, outspoken and acid-tongued, perpetually pickled drunk maneuver himself into successive positions of authority at the BBC, the British intelligence service(s), and the Foreign Office (especially a posting to buttoned up 1950s Washington, DC), and (ii) how damaging a spy was he really, or was he merely a flamboyant clown 'along for the ride,' tragically?
Along the way the book provides new detail after new detail as well. Some of that is mere trivia, but a lot of it contributes importantly to the full picture of the man that the books paints so effectively. If you want to read the names of the dozens of notable men with whom Burgess had 'affairs,' or even his preferred sexual positions, its all in here.
Burgess was the most clueless amid a clueless group. Why did those Yanks ever share anything with them?
In Burgess's cases even the wrapping was bad -- dirty, unkempt, odorous, rude, debauched -- karma unfolded and he ended up alone in that dump Moscow.
Way to go Guy. Throwing away privilege, a university education, free money from a doting mother, excused by oblivious bosses -- for what -- a useless system that provided nothing he would want with only its symbolism keeping it alive as its supporters deserted it on realizing that it produced nothing -- but privation, imprisonment, misery and death -- even to its most faithful.
Oh well Guy -- you wasted your time, and your life as did the other Cambridge boneheads. If you listen carefully you can hear the gods laughing.
A pathetic story that could have been interesting but wasn't really.
Having said that, Andrew Lownie's new take on Guy Burgess, Stalin's Englishman, is as well researched as we can possibly expect, given how foggy the life of Burgess turns out to be. By all accounts Lownie spent many years searching the archives on Burgess, yet there are still large holes in what can be known about Burgess, the most interesting but perhaps the least important, in terms of how much he shared with his Russian masters, of the trio of Philby, Maclean and Burgess.
I do think that Guy Burgess was by far the most interesting of the three -- a man with a first-rate mind, a man of many talents (music, drawing, history, politics, the drawing room) and a flamboyant, seldom boring great and loyal friend to scores of the top people of his generation in England. He was also a drunk, a slob and notoriously wore his homosexuality on his sleeve.
A son of English privilege, he had everything -- money, school at Eton College and Cambridge. He held key positions at the BBC and the British Foreign Office, and he was at the center of information about the rise of Hitler, of World War II, early Chinese communist rule and the beginning of the Cold War. Yet in the end he failed at almost everything, including spying, and ended his days in exile in Moscow, where he remained faithful to communism but hated everything Russian.
Lownie captures much of this. I wish he had expanded his last main chapter, Summing Up, and had given us more of his expert overview of the arc of Burgess' finally very sad life.
With its limitations, this new look at the Cambridge spies is well worth your time.
I noted only after finishing this book that the author attended school in Asheville, NC, my home town, before going to Cambridge.
Stripped away from the over-the-top sexual, smoking, and alcoholic excesses, this traitor's life had little left--even before those last empty years spent in the USSR. A burned-out hulk of a once promising life.
Looking back, what is astonishing is that Burgess lasted as long as he did while in purported loyal service to His Majesty's government.
Top reviews from other countries



I was not aware that Burgess was the son of a Naval Officer – not a particularly brilliant one, it transpired. Or that he had had a brief period at Dartmouth himself. As was the approved path for Naval Officers of the day, Papa Burgess married a wealthy wife. Guy Burgess would appear to have been the wealthiest of the Cambridge spy ring, drawing on his trust funded private income throughout his life, including making complex arrangements to be able to access it even after his flight to the Soviet Union. His relationship with his mother was frankly creepy and unhealthy. He had a brother, who did not seem to share in the golden glow of his mother’s affection, which was heavily tilted towards Guy. His father’s early and sudden death and the lurid circumstances of Burgess’s discovery of it (whether true or not) seemed to have been traumatic, and his mother’s remarriage to a perfectly harmless upper middle-class Army Officer appeared to cause lasting resentment. Burgess’s father never rose beyond middling rank in the Navy, and at Eton, although undoubtedly brilliant, Burgess was not among the gilded youth. This too seems to have bred resentment.
His discovery of Communism whilst at Cambridge, along with other well-documented adherents, was a turning point in his life. It seems extraordinary that he could consort with the rich and titled, wear his Old Etonian tie, and manoeuvre his way into the BBC and various Government services with the sole aim of extracting information with which to comprehensively betray them and his country. It does not seem any more explicable now than to his contemporaries, although Communism in Cambridge in the 1930’s was more than a tad fashionable – verging on the compulsory if you wished to be taken seriously, it seems. He clearly had a personal friendship with Philby, possibly the most inscrutable of the three. Excessive drinking was a trademark of all of them, but Burgess & Maclean were known by their Soviet handlers to be indiscreet when inebriated. In hindsight, the heavy clues and not very subtle declarations of left wing ideology that Burgess scattered around, makes it very hard to understand why the allegiance to the Soviet Union of these three clever, upper middle class, educated men, all with very different chips on their shoulders, was not uncovered at the time. The reason of course being that they “were one of us”. And/or that there were people at the top of the various organisations for which they worked who connived to cover up for them and are as yet undiscovered fellow sympathisers – hinted at but not proved by Mr Lownie.
Burgess’s wit, charm, facility with cartoons, along with his appalling drunkenness, promiscuous homosexuality, dirtiness and general unsavouriness, were well portrayed, though widely known and recorded. This book made me wonder whether it was in fact a convenient bluff/cover. In the last section the author tries to get behind what motivated him – as with all the Cambridge spies he seemed unable to recant even when the appalling genocides of Stalin became known. Whether through utter conviction, indifference or a refusal to step back from a proclaimed viewpoint, we will never know. I was interested in the point made that Burgess, Maclean and Philby all had very close relationships with their mothers, and had largely absent fathers. But this does not turn people into traitors as a general rule.
The sad postscript of Burgess’s life, living in Moscow (which he clearly hated) and where he failed to learn the language or lead the gilded life he’d always enjoyed, whilst avidly consuming the Fortnums’ hampers sent periodically to him by his still doting mother and wearing his old Etonian bow ties, was particularly telling. Fresh supplies of the OE ties were requested by any visitors to be purchased and sent on to him. As if the Soviets were going to give him a better table as a result! But sympathy for this self-imposed misery? Not in my book. But even if it did not completely unravel the mystery as to what propelled him to treachery, or answer the question “who was the most dangerous/despicable of the Cambridge spies?” it was an excellent read.

